Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Infections Succumbs to Blue Light
Infections Succumbs to Blue Light
January 2013
Blue light can selectively eradicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections of the skin and soft tissues, while preserving the outermost layer of skin, according to a proof-of-principle study led by Michael R. Hamblin of the Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Harvard Medical School in Boston. The research is published online ahead of print in the journal Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
"Blue light is a potential non-toxic, non-antibiotic approach for treating skin and soft tissue infections, especially those caused by antibiotic resistant pathogens," says Hamblin.
In the study, animal models were infected with P. aeruginosa. All of the animals in the group treated with blue light survived, while in the control, 82 percent (9 out of 11) of the animals died.
Skin and soft tissue infections are the second most common bacterial infections encountered in clinical practice, and represent the most common infection presentation—more than 3 percent—in patients visiting emergency departments, says Hamblin. The prevalence of skin and soft tissue infections among hospitalized patients is 10 percent, with approximately 14.2 million ambulatory care visits every year and an annual associated medical cost of almost $24 billion (equivalent to $76 for every American), says Hamblin.
Treatment of skin and soft tissue infections has been significantly complicated by the explosion of antibiotic resistance, which may bring an end to what medical scientists refer to as the antibiotic era, says Hamblin. "Microbes replicate very rapidly, and a mutation that helps a microbe survive in the presence of an antibiotic drug will quickly predominate throughout the microbial population. Recently, a dangerous new enzyme, NDM-1, that makes some bacteria resistant to almost all antibiotics available has been found in the United States. Many physicians are concerned that several infections soon may be untreatable."
Besides harming public health, antibiotic resistance boosts health care costs. "Treating resistant skin and soft tissue infections often requires the use of more expensive, or more toxic drugs, and can result in longer hospital stays for infected patients," says Hamblin.
Reference: Dai T, Gupta A, et al. 2013. Blue light rescues mice from potentially fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn infection: efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action. Antim. Agents Chemother. Published ahead of print Dec. 21, 2012 ,doi:10.1128/AAC.01652-12)
Labels: Antibiotic resistance, blue light, enzyme, Infection, NDM-1, Pseudomonas aeruginos, skin infections, soft tissue infections, treatment
# posted by Pat O'Connor @ 9:46 AM
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Vaccines and antibiotic resistance.
Vaccines and antibiotic resistance.
Sept 2012
Source
Novartis Vaccines, Research Center, via Fiorentina 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Abstract
Vaccines and antibiotics have significantly contributed to improve health and also to increase the longevity of human beings. The fast-acting effect of antibiotics makes them indispensable to treat infected patients. Likewise, when the causative agent of the infection is unknown and in cases of superinfections with different species of bacteria, antibiotics appear to be the only therapeutic option. On the contrary, vaccines are usually not efficacious in people already infected and their action is generally limited to a much narrowed range of pathogens. However, vaccines have contributed to the eradication of some of the most deadly infectious agents worldwide, can generate immunity to infections lasting for several years or life-long, and are able to induce herd immunity. Nonetheless, infectious diseases are still among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This is mainly owing to the emergence of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the lack of efficacious medications to treat several other infectious diseases. Development of new vaccines appears to be a promising solution to these issues. Indeed, with the advent of new discovery approaches and adjuvants, today is possible to make vaccines virtually against every pathogen. In addition, while vaccine-resistant bacteria have never been reported, accumulating literature is providing evidence that vaccination can reduce the raise of antibiotic resistant strains by decreasing their use.
Labels: Antibiotic resistance, bacteria, causative agent, immunity, superinfections, vaccine
# posted by Pat O'Connor @ 9:02 AM
Monday, August 27, 2012
Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections.
Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections.
National Guidelines Clearinghouse
Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The following comes from the Executive Summary of the guideline. Please see the full guideline for additional details about the topics discussed below.
The strength of recommendation (A-E) and quality of evidence (I-III) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.
Executive Summary
Soft-tissue infections are common, generally of mild to modest severity, and are easily treated with a variety of agents. An etiologic diagnosis of simple cellulitis is frequently difficult and generally unnecessary for patients with mild signs and symptoms of illness. Clinical assessment of the severity of infection is crucial, and several classification schemes and algorithms have been proposed to guide the clinician. However, most clinical assessments have been developed from either retrospective studies or from an author's own "clinical experience," illustrating the need for prospective studies with defined measurements of severity coupled to management issues and outcomes.
Until then, it is the recommendation of this committee that patients with soft-tissue infection accompanied by signs and symptoms of systemic toxicity (e.g., fever or hypothermia, tachycardia [heart rate >100 beats/min], and hypotension [systolic blood pressure, <90>13 mg/L, hospitalization should be considered and a definitive etiologic diagnosis pursued aggressively by means of procedures such as Gram stain and culture of needle aspiration or punch biopsy specimens, as well as requests for a surgical consultation for inspection, exploration, and/or drainage. Other clues to potentially severe deep soft-tissue infection include the following: (1) pain disproportionate to the physical findings, (2) violaceous bullae, (3) cutaneous hemorrhage, (4) skin sloughing, (5) skin anesthesia, (6) rapid progression, and (7) gas in the tissue. Unfortunately, these signs and symptoms often appear later in the course of necrotizing infections. In these cases, emergent surgical evaluation is of paramount importance for both diagnostic and therapeutic reasons.
Emerging antibiotic resistance among Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin resistance) and Streptococcus pyogenes (erythromycin resistance) are problematic, because both of these organisms are common causes of a variety of skin and soft-tissue infections and because empirical choices of antimicrobials must include agents with activity against resistant strains. Minor skin and soft-tissue infections may be empirically treated with semisynthetic penicillin, first-generation or second-generation oral cephalosporins, macrolides, or clindamycin (A-I); however, 50% of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains have inducible or constitutive clindamycin resistance. Most community-acquired MRSA strains remain susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline, though treatment failure rates of 21% have been reported in some series with doxycycline or minocycline. Therefore, if patients are sent home receiving these regimens, it is prudent to reevaluate them in 24-48 hours to verify a clinical response. Progression despite receipt of antibiotics could be due to infection with resistant microbes or because a deeper, more serious infection exists than was previously realized.
Patients who present to the hospital with severe infection or whose infection is progressing despite empirical antibiotic therapy should be treated more aggressively, and the treatment strategy should be based upon results of appropriate Gram stain, culture, and drug susceptibility analysis. In the case of S. aureus, the clinician should assume that the organism is resistant, because of the high prevalence of community-associated MRSA strains, and agents effective against MRSA (i.e., vancomycin, linezolid, or daptomycin) should be used (A-I). Stepdown to treatment with other agents, such as tetracycline or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, for MRSA infection may be possible, based on results of susceptibility tests and after an initial clinical response. In the United States, not all laboratories perform susceptibility testing on S. pyogenes. However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has provided national surveillance data that suggest a gradual trend of increasing macrolide resistance of S. pyogenes from 4%-5% in 1996-1998 to 8%-9% in 1999-2001. Of interest, 99.5% of strains remain susceptible to clindamycin, and 100% are susceptible to penicillin.
Impetigo, Erysipelas, and Cellulitis
Impetigo may be caused by infection with S. aureus and/or S. pyogenes. The decision of how to treat impetigo depends on the number of lesions, their location (face, eyelid, or mouth), and the need to limit spread of infection to others. The best topical agent is mupirocin (A-I), although resistance has been described; other agents, such as bacitracin and neomycin, are considerably less effective treatments. Patients who have numerous lesions or who are not responding to topical agents should receive oral antimicrobials effective against both S. aureus and S. pyogenes (A-I) (see the table below entitled "Antimicrobial Therapy for Impetigo and for Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections"). Although rare in developed countries (<1>
Classically, erysipelas is a fiery red, tender, painful plaque with well-demarcated edges and is commonly caused by streptococcal species, usually S. pyogenes.
Classically, erysipelas is a fiery red, tender, painful plaque with well-demarcated edges and is commonly caused by streptococcal species, usually S. pyogenes.
Cellulitis may be caused by numerous organisms that are indigenous to the skin or to particular environmental niches. Cellulitis associated with furuncles, carbuncles, or abscesses is usually caused by S. aureus. In contrast, cellulitis that is diffuse or unassociated with a defined portal is most commonly caused by streptococcal species. Important clinical clues to other causes include physical activities, trauma, water contact, and animal, insect, or human bites. In these circumstances appropriate culture material should be obtained, as they should be in patients who do not respond to initial empirical therapy directed against S. aureus and S. pyogenes and in immunocompromised hosts. Unfortunately, aspiration of skin is not helpful in 75%-80% of cases of cellulitis, and results of blood cultures are rarely positive (<5>
Penicillin, given either parenterally or orally depending on clinical severity, is the treatment of choice for erysipelas (A-I). For cellulitis, a penicillinase-resistant semisynthetic penicillin or a first-generation cephalosporin should be selected (A-I), unless streptococci or staphylococci resistant to these agents are common in the community. For penicillin-allergic patients, choices include clindamycin or vancomycin.
Antimicrobial Therapy for Impetigo and for Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
MRSA SSTI
For penicillin-allergic patients; parenteral drug of choice for treatment of infections caused by MRSA
Linezolid
Penicillin, given either parenterally or orally depending on clinical severity, is the treatment of choice for erysipelas (A-I). For cellulitis, a penicillinase-resistant semisynthetic penicillin or a first-generation cephalosporin should be selected (A-I), unless streptococci or staphylococci resistant to these agents are common in the community. For penicillin-allergic patients, choices include clindamycin or vancomycin.
Lack of clinical response could be due to unusual organisms, resistant strains of staphylococcus or streptococcus, or deeper processes, such as necrotizing fasciitis or myonecrosis. In patients who become increasingly ill or experience increasing toxicity, necrotizing fasciitis, myonecrosis, or toxic shock syndrome should be considered, an aggressive evaluation initiated, and antibiotic treatment modified, on the basis of Gram stain results, culture results, and antimicrobial susceptibilities of organisms obtained from surgical specimens.
Antimicrobial Therapy for Impetigo and for Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
Antibiotic therapy, by disease
Comment
Impetigo
Dicloxacillin
Cephalexin
Erythromycin
Impetigo
Dicloxacillin
Cephalexin
Erythromycin
Some strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes may be resistant
Clindamycin
Amoxicillin/clavulanate
Mupirocin ointment
Clindamycin
Amoxicillin/clavulanate
Mupirocin ointment
For patients with a limited number of lesions
MSSA SSTI
Nafcillin or oxacillin
Parental drug of choice; inactive against MRSA
Cefazolin
Nafcillin or oxacillin
Parental drug of choice; inactive against MRSA
Cefazolin
For penicillin-allergic patients, except those with immediate hypersensitivity reactions
Clindamycin
Bacteriostatic; potential of cross-resistance and emergence of resistance in erythromycin-resistant strains; inducible resistance in MRSA
Dicloxacillin
Oral agent of choice for methicillin-susceptible strains
Cephalexin
For penicillin-allergic patients, except those with immediate hypersensitivity reactions
Doxycycline, minocycline
Bacteriostatic; limited recent clinical experience
TMP-SMZ
For penicillin-allergic patients, except those with immediate hypersensitivity reactions
Doxycycline, minocycline
Bacteriostatic; limited recent clinical experience
TMP-SMZ
Bactericidal; efficacy poorly documented
Vancomycin
For penicillin-allergic patients; parenteral drug of choice for treatment of infections caused by MRSA
Linezolid
Bacteriostatic; limited clinical experience; no cross-resistance with other antibiotic classes; expensive; may eventually replace other second-line agents as a preferred agent for oral therapy of MRSA infections
Clindamycin
Bacteriostatic; potential of cross-resistance and emergence of resistance in erythromycin- resistant strains; inducible resistance in MRSA
Bacteriostatic; potential of cross-resistance and emergence of resistance in erythromycin- resistant strains; inducible resistance in MRSA
Daptomycin
Bactericidal; possible myopathy
Doxycycline, minocycline
Bacteriostatic, limited recent clinical experience
TMP-SMZ
Bactericidal; limited published efficacy data
Bactericidal; possible myopathy
Doxycycline, minocycline
Bacteriostatic, limited recent clinical experience
TMP-SMZ
Bactericidal; limited published efficacy data
Note: MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; SSTI, skin and soft-tissue infection; TMP-SMZ, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
Necrotizing Infections
Necrotizing fasciitis may be monomicrobial and caused by S. pyogenes, Vibrio vulnificus, or Aeromonas hydrophila. Recently, necrotizing fasciitis was described in a patient with MRSA infection. Polymicrobial necrotizing fasciitis may occur following surgery or in patients with peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, decubitus ulcers, and spontaneous mucosal tears of the gastrointestinal or gastrourinary tract (i.e., Fournier gangrene). As with clostridial myonecrosis, gas in the deep tissues is frequently found in these mixed infections.
Gas gangrene is a rapidly progressive infection caused by Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium septicum, Clostridium histolyticum, or Clostridium novyi. Severe penetrating trauma or crush injuries associated with interruption of the blood supply are the usual predisposing factors. C. perfringens and C. novyi infections have recently been described among heroin abusers following intracutaneous injection of black tar heroin. C. septicum, a more aerotolerant Clostridium species, may cause spontaneous gas gangrene in patients with colonic lesions (such as those due to diverticular disease), adenocarcinoma, or neutropenia.
Necrotizing fasciitis and gas gangrene may cause necrosis of skin, subcutaneous tissue, and muscle. Cutaneous findings of purple bullae, sloughing of skin, marked edema, and systemic toxicity mandate prompt surgical intervention. For severe group A streptococcal and clostridial necrotizing infections, parenteral clindamycin and penicillin treatment is recommended (A-II). A variety of antimicrobials directed against aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, as well as against anaerobes, may be used in mixed necrotizing infections (B-II).
Infections Following Animal or Human Bites
Animal bites account for 1% of all emergency department visits, and dog bites are responsible for 80% of such cases. Although Pasteurella species are the most common isolates, cat and dog bites contain an average of 5 different aerobic and anaerobic bacteria per wound, often including S. aureus, Bacteroides tectum, and Fusobacterium, Capnocytophaga, and Porphyromonas species. The decision to administer oral or parenteral antibiotics depends on the depth and severity of the wound and on the time since the bite occurred. Patients not allergic to penicillin should receive treatment with oral amoxicillin-clavulanate or with intravenous ampicillin-sulbactam or ertapenem (B-II), because agents such as dicloxacillin, cephalexin, erythromycin, and clindamycin have poor activity against Pasteurella multocida. Although cefuroxime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone are effective against P. multocida, they do not have good anaerobic spectra. Thus, cefoxitin or carbapenem antibiotics could be used parenterally in patients with mild penicillin allergies. Patients with previous severe reactions can receive oral or intravenous doxycycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or a fluoroquinolone plus clindamycin.
Human bites may occur from accidental injuries, purposeful biting, or closed fist injuries. The bacteriologic characteristics of these wounds are complex but include infection with aerobic bacteria, such as streptococci, S. aureus, and Eikenella corrodens, as well as with multiple anaerobic organisms, including Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas species. E. corrodens is resistant to first-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, clindamycin, and aminoglycosides. Thus, intravenous treatment with ampicillin-sulbactam or cefoxitin is the best choice (B-III).
Human bites may occur from accidental injuries, purposeful biting, or closed fist injuries. The bacteriologic characteristics of these wounds are complex but include infection with aerobic bacteria, such as streptococci, S. aureus, and Eikenella corrodens, as well as with multiple anaerobic organisms, including Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas species. E. corrodens is resistant to first-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, clindamycin, and aminoglycosides. Thus, intravenous treatment with ampicillin-sulbactam or cefoxitin is the best choice (B-III).
Infections Associated with Animal Contact
Infections associated with animal contact, although uncommon, are frequently severe, sometimes lethal, and diagnostically challenging. The potential use of Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis, and Yersinia pestis for bioterrorism has generated great interest in rapid diagnostic techniques, because early recognition and treatment are essential. Doxycycline or ciprofloxacin therapy is recommended in standard doses for nonpregnant adults and children 18 years of age, pending identification of the offending agent (B-III).
Adults and children who receive a diagnosis of tularemia should receive an aminoglycoside, preferably streptomycin or gentamicin, for 7-10 days. In mild cases, doxycycline or tetracycline for 14 days is recommended (B-III) (comments regarding treatment of children <8>
Data regarding antibiotic efficacy for treatment of cat-scratch disease are inconclusive, although 1 small study demonstrated more-rapid lymph node regression in patients receiving azithromycin, compared with patients receiving no treatment. Cutaneous bacillary angiomatosis has not been systematically studied, but treatment with erythromycin or doxycycline in standard doses for 4 weeks has been effective in very small series (B-III).
Antibiotic Therapy for SSIs, By Site of Operation
Intestinal or genital tract
Duration of Therapy: 7-14 days
Fredquency or reason for surgery: Rare
Adjunct: G-CSF/GM-CSF;
IDSA GUIDELINES
Data regarding antibiotic efficacy for treatment of cat-scratch disease are inconclusive, although 1 small study demonstrated more-rapid lymph node regression in patients receiving azithromycin, compared with patients receiving no treatment. Cutaneous bacillary angiomatosis has not been systematically studied, but treatment with erythromycin or doxycycline in standard doses for 4 weeks has been effective in very small series (B-III).
On the basis of very incomplete data, erysipeloid is best treated with oral penicillin or amoxicillin for 10 days (B-III). E. rhusiopathiae is resistant in vitro to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin (E-III).
Surgical Site Infections
Surgical soft-tissue infections include those occurring postoperatively and those severe enough to require surgical intervention for diagnosis and treatment. The algorithm presented in the original guideline document clearly indicates that surgical site infection rarely occurs during the first 48 hours after surgery, and fever during that period usually arises from noninfectious or unknown causes. In contrast, after 48 hours, surgical site infection is a more common source of fever, and careful inspection of the wound is indicated. For patients with a temperature <38 .5=".5">38.5 degrees C or a heart rate >110 beats/minute generally require antibiotics as well as opening of the suture line. Infections developing after surgical procedures involving nonsterile tissue, such as colonic, vaginal, biliary, or respiratory mucosa, may be caused by a combination of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. These infections can rapidly progress and involve deeper structures than just the skin, such as fascia, fat, or muscle (see table below entitled "Antibiotic Choices for Incisional Surgical Site Infections").
Antibiotic Choices for Incisional Surgical Site Infections (SSIs).
Antibiotic Choices for Incisional Surgical Site Infections (SSIs).
Single agents
Cefoxitin
Ceftizoxime
Ampicillin/sulbactam
Ticarcillin/clavulanate
Piperacillin/tazobactam
Imipenem/cilastatin
Meropenem
Ertapenem
Combination agents
Cefoxitin
Ceftizoxime
Ampicillin/sulbactam
Ticarcillin/clavulanate
Piperacillin/tazobactam
Imipenem/cilastatin
Meropenem
Ertapenem
Combination agents
Facultative and aerobic activity
Fluoroquinolone
Third-generation cephalosporin
Aztreonama
Aminoglycoside
Anaerobic activity
Clindamycin
Metronidazolea
Chloramphenicol
Third-generation cephalosporin
Aztreonama
Aminoglycoside
Anaerobic activity
Clindamycin
Metronidazolea
Chloramphenicol
Penicillin agent plus beta-lactamase inhibitor Nonintestinal
Trunk and extremities away from axilla or perineum
Trunk and extremities away from axilla or perineum
Oxacillin
First-generation cephalosporin
Axillary or perineum
Cefoxitin
Ampicillin/sulbactam
Other single agents as described above for intestinal and genital operations
First-generation cephalosporin
Axillary or perineum
Cefoxitin
Ampicillin/sulbactam
Other single agents as described above for intestinal and genital operations
Infections in the Immunocompromised Host
Skin and soft tissues are common sites of infection in compromised hosts and usually pose major diagnostic challenges for the following 3 reasons: (1) infections are caused by diverse organisms, including organisms not ordinarily considered to be pathogens in otherwise healthy hosts; (2) infection of the soft tissues may occur as part of a broader systemic infection; and (3) the degree and type of immune deficiency attenuate the clinical findings. The importance of establishing a diagnosis and performing susceptibility testing is crucial, because many infections are hospital acquired, and mounting resistance among both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria makes dogmatic empirical treatment regimens difficult, if not dangerous. In addition, fungal infections may present with cutaneous findings.
Immunocompromised patients who are very ill or experiencing toxicity typically require very broad-spectrum empirical agents that include specific coverage for resistant gram-positive bacteria, such as MRSA (e.g., vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, or quinupristin/dalfopristin). Coverage for gram-negative bacteria may include monotherapy with a cephalosporin possessing activity against Pseudomonas species, with carbapenems, or with a combination of either a fluoroquinolone or an aminoglycoside plus either an extended-spectrum penicillin or cephalosporin.
Infections in patients with cell-mediated immunodeficiency (such as that due to Hodgkin disease, lymphoma, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection, bone marrow transplantation, and receipt of long-term high-dose immunosuppressive therapy) can be caused by either common or unusual bacteria, viruses, protozoa, helminths, or fungi. Although infection may begin in the skin, cutaneous lesions can also be the result of hematogenous seeding. A well planned strategy for prompt diagnosis, including biopsy and aggressive treatment protocols, is essential. Diagnostic strategies require laboratory support capable of rapid processing and early detection of bacteria (including Mycobacteria and Nocardia species), viruses, and fungi. The algorithm presented in the original guideline document provides an approach to diagnosis and treatment. The empirical antibiotic guidelines are based on results of clinical trials, national surveillance antibiograms, and consensus meetings. Because antimicrobial susceptibilities vary considerably across the nation, clinicians must base empirical treatment on the antibiograms in their own location.
Microbiologic cultures are important in establishing a specific diagnosis, and testing the drug susceptibility of organisms is critical for optimal antimicrobial treatment. This guideline offers recommendations for empirical treatment of specific community-acquired and hospital-acquired infections. Nonetheless, therapy may fail for several reasons: (1) the initial diagnosis and/or treatment chosen is incorrect, (2) the etiologic agent from a given locale is resistant to antibiotics, (3) antimicrobial resistance develops during treatment, and (4) the infection is deeper and more complex than originally estimated.
Skin
Neutropenia - Initial infection
Bacteria: Gram negative
Type of therapy: Monotherapy or antibiotic combination
Labels: Antibiotic resistance, cellulitis, clindamycin, Daptomycin, Dicloxacillin, erysipelas, gangrene, immunocompromised, impetigo, management, MRSA, necrotizing fasciitis, skin, soft tissue infections
# posted by Pat O'Connor @ 10:11 AM
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Anti-infective treatment of bacterial urinary tract infections.
Anti-infective treatment of bacterial urinary tract infections.
Curr Med Chem. 2008
Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Naber KG, Perletti G, Wagenlehner CM, Weidner W.
Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany. Wagenlehner@AOL.com.
Bacterial urinary tract infections (UTI) are frequently found in the outpatient as well as in the nosocomial setting. The bacterial UTI can be stratified into uncomplicated and complicated UTI. Antibiotic resistance is continuously increasing in uncomplicated as well as complicated UTI. In uncomplicated UTI efforts are made to use antibiotic substances exclusively for this indication. In complicated UTI as broad spectrum antibiotics are increasingly used, the higher the antimicrobial resistance rates are reported. There are two predominant aims in the antimicrobial treatment of both uncomplicated and complicated UTI: 1.) rapid and effective response to therapy, prevention of complications and prevention of recurrence in the individual patient treated, and 2.) prevention of emergence of resistance to anti-infective agents in the microbial environment. The use of antibiotics has to keep up with the continuous change in antimicrobial resistance and the tailored needs in the individual patient.
Antibiotic substances therefore need to become evaluated for each indication and continuously followed for clinical usage. The knowledge of structure-activity relationships of antimicrobial substances and bacterial resistance mechanisms to antibiotics help to use antibiotics better in daily routine and design new derivatives and substances. The aim of this review is to describe the chemistry and structure-activity relationships of current antibiotics and promising substances in development for the treatment of UTI.
PMID: 18537619 [PubMed - in process]
Curr Med Chem. 2008
Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Naber KG, Perletti G, Wagenlehner CM, Weidner W.
Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany. Wagenlehner@AOL.com.
Bacterial urinary tract infections (UTI) are frequently found in the outpatient as well as in the nosocomial setting. The bacterial UTI can be stratified into uncomplicated and complicated UTI. Antibiotic resistance is continuously increasing in uncomplicated as well as complicated UTI. In uncomplicated UTI efforts are made to use antibiotic substances exclusively for this indication. In complicated UTI as broad spectrum antibiotics are increasingly used, the higher the antimicrobial resistance rates are reported. There are two predominant aims in the antimicrobial treatment of both uncomplicated and complicated UTI: 1.) rapid and effective response to therapy, prevention of complications and prevention of recurrence in the individual patient treated, and 2.) prevention of emergence of resistance to anti-infective agents in the microbial environment. The use of antibiotics has to keep up with the continuous change in antimicrobial resistance and the tailored needs in the individual patient.
Antibiotic substances therefore need to become evaluated for each indication and continuously followed for clinical usage. The knowledge of structure-activity relationships of antimicrobial substances and bacterial resistance mechanisms to antibiotics help to use antibiotics better in daily routine and design new derivatives and substances. The aim of this review is to describe the chemistry and structure-activity relationships of current antibiotics and promising substances in development for the treatment of UTI.
PMID: 18537619 [PubMed - in process]
Labels: (UTI), Antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial substances, Bacterial urinary tract infections
# posted by Pat O'Connor @ 7:41 AM
Friday, November 02, 2007
Household contacts were key factor for children's colonization with resistant Escherichia coli in community setting.
Household contacts were key factor for children's colonization with resistant Escherichia coli in community setting.
Lietzau S, Raum E, von Baum H, Marre R, Brenner H.
Department of Epidemiology, German Centre for Research on Ageing, Heidelberg, Germany.
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance, Bacterial, E. coli, Children, Household, Transmission
OBJECTIVE: In young children infections with resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) can lead to life-threatening situations. Epidemiological data on the prevalence and major determinants of carriage of antibiotic resistant E. coli among children in the community setting are sparse.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a population-based study from Germany, stool samples were obtained from children aged 6 months to 4 years attending a pediatrician for a regular health screening (N=568) or an acute infection (N=316), as well as from their parents (N=1,594) and siblings (N=624). E. coli was cultured, and minimal inhibitory concentrations to various antibiotics were tested. We determined prevalences of E. coli resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics and their association with potential risk factors.
RESULTS: Prevalence of E. coli resistance was 16.6%, 8.7%, and 11.6% for ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and doxycycline, respectively. Strong associations were found with antibiotic resistance among siblings (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals] for ampicillin, doxycycline, and cotrimoxazole resistance: 4.4 [1.8-10.8], 8.0 [3.0-21.2], and 10.8 [3.5-32.7], respectively).
CONCLUSION: Resistance prevalences in this community-based study were much lower than those reported from the clinical sector. Household contacts seem to be the key factor for children;s colonization with resistant E. coli in the community setting.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov
Lietzau S, Raum E, von Baum H, Marre R, Brenner H.
Department of Epidemiology, German Centre for Research on Ageing, Heidelberg, Germany.
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance, Bacterial, E. coli, Children, Household, Transmission
OBJECTIVE: In young children infections with resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) can lead to life-threatening situations. Epidemiological data on the prevalence and major determinants of carriage of antibiotic resistant E. coli among children in the community setting are sparse.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a population-based study from Germany, stool samples were obtained from children aged 6 months to 4 years attending a pediatrician for a regular health screening (N=568) or an acute infection (N=316), as well as from their parents (N=1,594) and siblings (N=624). E. coli was cultured, and minimal inhibitory concentrations to various antibiotics were tested. We determined prevalences of E. coli resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics and their association with potential risk factors.
RESULTS: Prevalence of E. coli resistance was 16.6%, 8.7%, and 11.6% for ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and doxycycline, respectively. Strong associations were found with antibiotic resistance among siblings (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals] for ampicillin, doxycycline, and cotrimoxazole resistance: 4.4 [1.8-10.8], 8.0 [3.0-21.2], and 10.8 [3.5-32.7], respectively).
CONCLUSION: Resistance prevalences in this community-based study were much lower than those reported from the clinical sector. Household contacts seem to be the key factor for children;s colonization with resistant E. coli in the community setting.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov
Labels: Antibiotic resistance, Bacterial, children, childrens infection, community acquired, E. coli, Household, resistant Escherichia coli, Transmission
# posted by Pat O'Connor @ 10:21 PM
